A mailbox that can store the address is not a person who opted in.

Answer A mailbox that can store the address is not a person who opted in. RFC 9755 is about IMAP support for UTF-8. The document is titled IMAP Support for UTF-8. It is about mail software that can store an address written with a wider set of characters. Do not claim it replaces another document. Storing an address is not consent. A rented send is one letter to someone else's list. The note is not that letter and not permission.

Cream stationery and a teal accent on a dark navy desk — Storage is not the same thing as a yes.

The note that started this: RFC 9755, IMAP Support for UTF-8, RFC 9755.

Sellers point at the software and skip the person. The program can keep the address. That is all the citation proves. If you are about to buy solo ads, ask which list the address came from and whether that person asked for this kind of letter. A stored row can be a customer, an old lead, or a test. The specification will not sort those cases. Write the answer on the order.

The document is a fact about mail software. It is not a solo ad price, a rank, or proof that a stranger opted in. A wider set of characters matters when a name would otherwise be mangled. It still does not mean the person wanted the offer. Treat a storage boast the way you treat a boast about a larger mailbox. Useful for the operator. Silent on consent.

What does RFC 9755 cover?

RFC 9755 is about IMAP support for UTF-8. A mailbox can store an address that uses a wider set of characters. Do not claim the document replaces another document. Storing an address is not consent.

IMAP is how a mail program talks to a mailbox that already holds messages. Support for UTF-8 means the mailbox can keep text and addresses that use a wider set of characters. That is a storage question. It belongs to the operator of the mailbox. It becomes your problem only when the creative uses those characters and you need the letter to stay readable. It is not a question about whether anyone joined.

Ask for a plain test before you pay. Can the seller show a letter, in a real mailbox, where a name in the list's own script survived. If they cannot, the citation is a brochure. If they can, you learned something about readability and nothing about permission. A readable unwanted letter is still unwanted. Keep those results apart.

The order names the list, not the mailbox feature.
A stored address is not called an opt-in.
A test to your own mailbox checks characters only.
The refund line is written on the order before you pay.

Does a stored address mean the person opted in?

No. A mailbox that can store the address is not a person who opted in. Storage is a feature of the software. Opt-in is a decision by a person. The document is not proof a stranger asked for mail.

Consent has a shape you can ask about. The person asked to hear from this list, about this kind of offer, and they can leave. A seller who answers with a protocol title has not answered. Ask who mailed this file last, and what the offer was. If the reply is another citation, you do not have a list story. Buy the list story or do not buy.

Affiliate buyers get hurt in a specific way. The offer assumes interest. The file only shows that an address fit in a mailbox. People who never asked can complain, and the domain on the order wears that complaint. You cannot repair the complaint with a character set. You also cannot cite this document as the opt-in you never had.

What should the order name before you pay?

Name the list, the sending domain, and the refund line. RFC 9755 is a fact about mail software. It is not a solo ad price, a rank, or permission to send. A buyer still has to name them before paying.

The list name should be specific enough that a complaint hits the right file. A niche label with no owner is not a name. The sending domain should be the domain the reader will see, not a string revealed after you pay. The refund line should say what happens if the send does not match the order. A page you never opened is not a line on the order.

A seller who hides behind the citation would rather discuss software than the file. That is useful information. Take it and do not pay yet. Compare the quote against solo ad pricing only after the list, the domain, and the refund line are written down. A mailbox that can store the address is still not a person who opted in.