A filter that reads a delivery notice is not the notice itself.

Answer A filter that reads a delivery notice is not the notice itself. RFC 6009 describes Sieve extensions for delivery status notifications and deliver-by. Reading a notice in a filter is not the same as the delivery result. The document is RFC 6009, titled Sieve Email Filtering: Delivery Status Notifications and Deliver-By Extensions. That is a fact about mail software or about an old specification. It is not a solo ad price, a rank, or proof that a stranger opted in. A rented send is one letter to someone else's list. A filter that knows how to look at a notice has not produced the notice, and it has not produced your letter.

The note that started this: RFC 6009, Sieve Email Filtering: Delivery Status Notifications and Deliver-By Extensions, RFC 6009.

Delivery status notifications are notices about what happened to a message. Deliver-by is the other extension in the same document. A Sieve filter can read that kind of notice. Reading is not the result. If you are checking safe solo ads sellers, ask for the result that belongs to your send, not for a filter that can read notices in general. Capability is not the outcome of the letter you are buying.

Sellers show the filter because it looks like care. A buyer sees machinery and assumes the machinery already ran for them. It may never have seen their letter. It may be a script that could look at a notice if a notice existed. The document describes extensions for that looking. It does not hand you a delivery result, and it does not turn the filter into the notice. Keep the two nouns apart on the call.

What do the Sieve extensions in RFC 6009 cover?

RFC 6009 describes Sieve extensions for delivery status notifications and deliver-by. Reading a notice in a filter is not the same as the delivery result. The document is titled Sieve Email Filtering: Delivery Status Notifications and Deliver-By Extensions.

Cover means the filter language can deal with those notices and with deliver-by. That is a feature for people who run filters. It is not a report you paste into a solo ad order. You do not need the inner tests. You need the distinction the fact already draws. A filter reading a notice is one thing. The delivery result is another. A seller who offers you the first has not offered you the second.

You can leave the call believing delivery was shown, when only a reader of notices was shown. Later you ask for the notice and the seller resends the filter. Admit at the start that the filter is not the result. Then ask whether a result for your letter exists at all.

• A filter is not called a delivery result.
• Deliver-by is not described as a promise about your solo.
• The list and the domain are named without the script.
• The refund line refers to the send, not to the filter's ability to read.

Is a filter that reads a notice the notice itself?

No. A filter that reads a delivery notice is not the notice itself. The extensions are a fact about mail software or about an old specification. It is not a solo ad price, a rank, or proof that a stranger opted in.

The notice, when it exists, talks about a message. The filter, when it exists, is software that can look. Looking at a class of notices does not create a notice about your rented letter. It also does not show that a stranger opted in. Opt-in is not a delivery status. A seller who stacks the filter, the notice, and the signup into one sentence has made a sentence the document will not support.

Do not invent a happy result because the extension exists, and do not invent a failure because it exists. Existence of a way to read notices is not news about your drop. If the seller has a real notice about the letter you bought, they can talk about that notice as a notice. If they can only talk about the filter, they do not have the notice. Pay for neither until the order names the list, the domain, and the refund.

What does the buyer still name when a filter is on offer?

A buyer still has to name the list, the sending domain, and the refund line on the order. A filter that can read a notice does not put those names on the page. Ask for the send those names describe.

The names are how you recognize the letter later. Without them, a filter demo has nothing to attach to. You cannot refund a vague sense that delivery was handled. You can refund a send that was not the list and domain on the order, if the refund line says so. Write that line while the filter is still only a filter. Once you pay, the demo has done its distracting work.

A filter that reads a delivery notice is not the notice itself. For an affiliate letter, solo ads for affiliate marketing still means one rented send to a named list. The extensions in the document do not change that. If the seller's evidence is a script that can read notices, you have not seen the result, and you have not seen permission. Do not pay for the script.